Complex structural-geomorphological, structural-morphological and fractal analysis of vertical newest movements of the Kerch Peninsula
https://doi.org/10.33623/0579-9406-2019-5-19-29
Abstract
A comprehensive analysis was carried out for the Kerch Peninsula using morphostructural, structural and geomorphological methods as well as determining the fractal dimension D of the driangle system. It has been discovered that increased values of the field of fractal dimension D correlate well with the total uplift amplitude during the Pleistocene and Holocene, and worse with the latest structures formed during the conerosion stage of development. It can be concluded that the fractal approach for the quantitative analysis of the driangle system pattern gives good results in identifying the latest movements, and is less effective in identifying the latest structures. The further development of the fractal analysis method is promising, with the inclusion of other driangle system parameters widely used in structural-geomorphological analysis.
About the Authors
D. A. Simonov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Faculty of Geology, 119991, Moscow, GSP-1, Leninskiye Gory, 1
Russian Federation
Faculty of Geology, 119991, Moscow, GSP-1, Leninskiye Gory, 1
V. S. Zakharov
Lomonosov Moscow State University;
University “Dubna”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Faculty of Geology, 119991, Moscow, GSP-1, Leninskiye Gory, 1;
141980, MO, Dubna, University st., 19
G. V. Bryantseva
Lomonosov Moscow State University;
University “Dubna”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Faculty of Geology, 119991, Moscow, GSP-1, Leninskiye Gory, 1;
141980, MO, Dubna, University st., 19
References
1. Геология СССР. Т. 8. Крым. Ч. I. Геологическое описание / Ред. М.В. Муратов. М.: Недра, 1969. 576 с.
2. Захаров В.С. Анализ характеристик самоподобия сейсмичности и систем активных разломов Евразии // Вестн. Моск. ун-та. Сер. 4. Геология. 2011. № 6. С. 10–17.
3. Захаров В.С., Симонов Д.А., Брянцева Г.В., Косевич Н.И. Характеристики самоподобия системы водотоков Керченского полуострова и их сопоставление с результатами структурно-геоморфологического анализа // Геофизические процессы и биосфера. 2019. T. 18, № 1. С. 50–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.21455/GPB2019.1-5.
4. Корчуганова Н.И., Костенко Н.П., Межеловский Н.Н. Неотектонические методы поисков полезных ископаемых. М., 2001. 212 с. (МПР РФ геокарт. МГГА).
5. Мельник М.А., Поздняков А.В. Фрактальный анализ эрозионного расчлененного рельефа: методологические подходы // Вестн. Томск. гос. ун-та. 2007. № 301. С. 201–205.
6. Муратов М.В. Краткий очерк геологического строения Крымского полуострова. М.: Госгеолтехиздат, 1960. 207 с.
7. Сидорчук А.Ю. Фрактальная геометрия речных сетей // Геоморфология. 2014. № 1. С. 3–14.
8. Симонов Д.А., Брянцева Г.В. Морфоструктурный анализ при неотектонических реконструкциях Керченского полуострова // Бюлл. МОИП. Отд. геол. 2018. Т. 93, вып. 3. С. 12–25
9. Федер Е. Фракталы. М.: Мир, 1991. 260 с. Философов В.П. Основы морфометрического метода поисков тектонических структур. Саратов: Изд-во Сарат. гос. ун-та, 1975. 232 с.
10. Dombradi E., Timar G., Bada G. et al. Fractal dimension estimations of drainage network in the Carpathian–Pannonian system // Global and Planet. Change. 2007. Vol. 58. P. 197–213.
11. Donadio C., Magdaleno F., Mazzarella A., Kondolf G.M. Fractal dimension of the hydrographic pattern of three large rivers in the Mediterranean morphoclimatic system: geomorphologic interpretation of Russian (USA), Ebro (Spain) and Volturno (Italy) Fluvial Geometry // Pure Appl. Geophys. 2015. Vol. 172. P. 1975–1984. doi: 10.1007/s00024-014-0910-z.
12. Fac-Beneda J. Fractal structure of the Kashubian hydrographic system // J. Hydrology. 2013. Vol. 488. P. 48–54. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.02.033
13. Jenson S.K., Domingue J.O. Extracting topographic ttructure from digital elevation data for geographic information system analysis // Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 1988. Vol. 54, N 11. P. 1593–1600.
14. Pelletier J.D. Self-organization and scaling relationships of evolving river networks // J. Geophys. Res. 1999. Vol. 104, B4. P. 7359–7375.
15. Strahler A.N. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology // Transact. Amer. Geophys. Union. 1957. Vol. 38, N 6. P. 913–920.
16. Turcotte D.L. Fractals and Chaos in Geology and Geophysics. Second edit. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1997. 398 p.
Review
For citations:
Simonov D.A., Zakharov V.S., Bryantseva G.V. Complex structural-geomorphological, structural-morphological and fractal analysis of vertical newest movements of the Kerch Peninsula. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 4. Geology. 2019;(5):19-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33623/0579-9406-2019-5-19-29
Views:
214
Email this article 
