Determination of seismic generation zones of Fennoscandia according to data of analysis of seismicity and computer geodynamic modelling
https://doi.org/10.33623/0579-9406-2021-1-15-22
Abstract
The work is devoted to the problem of identifying zones of seismic generstion zones of Fennoscandia, for the solution of which structural-geomorphological interpretation was carried out, seismicity analysis and computer modeling of the latest geodynamics were performed. According to the results of structural-geomorphological interpretation, the territory under consideration was divided into 6 large blocks. Computer modeling showed that each of them is characterized by a certain type of stress state in recent times, and also allowed us to calculate the probability of the formation of new short-distance faults. The reliability of the constructed models is evidenced by the established numerical correlation between this parameter and the density of earthquake epicenters. Based on the data on the density of earthquake epicenters and areas of the possible formation of new faults, a map of seismic generation zones of Fennoscandia was developed.
About the Authors
A. A. Sentsov
Schmidt Earth Physics Institute RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
123242, Moscow, Bol’shaya Gruzinskaya str., 10–1
A. O. Agibalov
Lomonosov Moscow State University; Schmidt Earth Physics Institute RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
119991, Moscow, GSP-1, Leninskiye Gory, 1
123242, Moscow, Bol’shaya Gruzinskaya str., 10–1
References
1. Землетрясения и микросейсмичность в задачах современной геодинамики Восточно-Европейской платформы / Под ред. Н.В. Шарова, А.А. Маловчинко, Ю.К. Щукина. Кн. 1. Землетрясения. Петрозаводск: Карельский научный центр РАН, 2007. 381 с.
2. Костенко Н.П. Геоморфология. М.: Изд-во Моск. ун-та, 1999. 379 с.
3. Михайлов В.О., Тимошкина Е.П., Ляховский В. Сравнительный анализ временных вариаций глобального гравитационного поля по данным спутников ГРЕЙС в областях трех недавних гигантских землетрясений // Физика Земли. 2014. № 2. С. 29–40.
4. Никонов А.А., Шварев С.В. Сейсмолинеаменты и разрушительные землетрясения в российской части Балтийского щита: новые решения для последних 13 тысяч лет // Мат-лы Междунар. конф. «Геолого-геофизическая среда и разнообразные проявления сейсмичности». Нерюнгри, 2015. С. 243–251.
5. Панасенко Г.Д. Сейсмические особенности северовостока Балтийского шита. Л.: Наука, 1969, 184 с.
6. Руководство пользователя «Analysis Package Reservoir Modelling System (RMS)», 2012. URL: www.geodisaster.ru/index.php?page=uchebnye-posobiya-2 (дата обращения: 01.12.2019).
7. Сейсмологический каталог Американской геологической службы. URL: https://earthquake.usgs.gov/ (дата обращения: 01.12.2019а).
8. Сейсмологический каталог единой геофизической службы РАН. URL: http://www.ceme.gsras.ru/cgi-bin/new/catalog.pl (дата обращения: 01.12.2019б).
9. Сейсмологический каталог Хельсинского университета. URL: http://www.seismo.helsinki.fi/english (дата обращения: 01.12.2019в).
10. Цветкова Т.А., Бугаенко И.В., Заец Л.Н. Главная геодинамическая граница и сейсмическая визуализация плюмов Восточно-Европейской платформы // Геофизический журнал. 2019. Т. 41, № 1. С. 137–152.
11. Юдахин Ф.Н. Геодинамические процессы в земной коре и сейсмичность континентальной части европейского Севера // Литосфера. 2002. № 2. С. 3–23.
12. Becker J.J., Sandwell D.T., Smith W.H.F. et al. Global bathymetry and elevation data at 30 Arc Seconds Resolution: SRTM30_PLUS // Marine Geodesy. 2009. Vol. 32 (4). P. 355–371.
13. Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) Mission. URL: https://www.gfz-potsdam.de/en/grace (дата обращения: 01.12.2019).
14. Keiding M., Kreemer C., Lindholm C.D. et al. A comparison of strain rates and seismicity for Fennoscandia: depth dependency of deformation from glacial isostatic adjustment // Geophys. J. Intern. 2015. Vol. 202. P. 1021–1028.
15. King G.C.P., Cocco M. Fault interaction by elastic stress changes: New clues from earthquake sequences. Advances in Geophysics. 2001. Vol. 44. P. 1–38.
16. Kukkonen I.T., Olesen O., Ask M. V.S. PFDP Working Group Postglacial Faults in Fennoscandia: Targets for scientific drilling // GFF. 2010. Vol. 132. P. 71–81.
17. Mikhailov V.O., Timoshkina E.P., Hayan M. et al. Comparative study of temporal variations in the Earth’s gravity field using GRACE gravity models in the regions of threerecent giant earthquakes // Physics of the Solid Earth. 2014. Vol. 50 (2). P. 177–191.
18. Mörner N.–A. Active faults and paleoseismicity in Fennoscandia, especially Sweden. Primary structures and secondary effects // Tectonophysics. 2004. Vol. 380. P. 139–157.
19. Ojala A.E.K., Mattila J., Ruskeenieme T. et al. Postglacial seismic activity along the Isovaara–Riikonkumpu fault complex // Global and Planet. Change. 2017. Vol. 157. P. 59–72.
20. Olesen O., Bungum H., Dehls J. et al. Neotectonics, seismicity and contemporary stress field in Norway — mechanisms and implications // Quaternary Geology of Norway, Geological Survey of Norway. Spec. Publ. 2013. Vol. 13. P. 145–174.
21. Smith C.A., Sundh M., Mikko H. Surficial geology indicates early Holocene faulting and seismicity, Central Sweden // Intern. J. Earth Sci. 2014. Vol. 103. P. 1711–1724.
22. Sutinen R., Hyvönen E., Kukkonen I. LiDAR detection of paleolandslides in the vicinity of the Suasselkäpostglacial fault, Finnish Lapland // Intern. J. Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 2014. Vol. 27. P. 91–97.
Review
For citations:
Sentsov A.A., Agibalov A.O. Determination of seismic generation zones of Fennoscandia according to data of analysis of seismicity and computer geodynamic modelling. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 4. Geology. 2021;1(1):15-22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33623/0579-9406-2021-1-15-22
Views:
295
Email this article 
